(SALT LAKE HUB SIDE LETTERS)

 

February 1, 1997

Side Letter No. 1

Gentlemen:

This refers to the handling of health and welfare benefits for employees involved in the UP/SP merger.

In order to ensure appropriate health and welfare coverage for affected employees, it is agreed that employees transferring from one collective bargaining  agreement to another (i.e., DRGW/ SP West employees to UP Northern Idaho) may elect one of the following options which must be exercised within thirty (30) days from the notice of merger implementation:

(A) Elect to retain present coverage.

OR

(B) Elect to accept the health and welfare coverage applicable to the territory to which transferred.

An employee failing to make an election shall be considered as having retained option (A).  A health and welfare benefits election form, attached as Exhibit “A”, will be furnished to employees who transfer so they can make an election.

Yours truly,

W.S. Hinckley

General Director Labor Relations

AGREED:

_______________________                               _________________________

General Chairman UPED                                                General Chairman DRGW

_______________________                               _________________________

General Chairman UPWR                                      General Chairman SP West

                                    Exhibit “A”

HEALTH AND WELFARE BENEFITS ELECTION FORM

In order to insure appropriate health and welfare benefits are maintained for affected employees as a result of the UP/SP merger, one of the following options must be selected within (30) days from the date this form is received by employees who transfer from one collective bargaining agreement to another:

___            (A)            Elect to maintain present coverage.

___ (B) Elect to accept the health and welfare coverage applicable to the territory to which transferred.

An employee failing to make an election within the above time frame shall be considered as having retained present coverage under Option (A).

                        ______________________

                        Employee Name

                        ______________________

                        Social Security Number

                        _______________________

                        Craft

                        ________________________

                        Location

MAIL TO:

Joe Cvetas

Union Pacific Railroad Company

1416 Dodge Street, Room 332

Omaha, Nebraska 68179

                        February 1, 1997

                        Side Letter No. 2

Gentlemen:

During our negotiations we discussed ARTICLE 6 - LIFE INSURANCE  and ARTICLE 9 - DISABILITY INSURANCE of the September 1995 Agreement between Southern Pacific Lines and your Organization.  It was your position that coverages provided by the former agreement should be preserved for the former Southern Pacific engineers covered by this Implementing Agreement under the New York Dock protective conditions unless extended by agreement.

This will confirm that Carrier agreed that the premium payments required by agreement would continue for those Southern Pacific engineers who are covered by this implementing agreement and who are presently covered under those plans. These benefits will be maintained for such employees for six years from the implementation date of this agreement.

It is understood this agreement is made without prejudice to the positions of either party regarding whether or not such benefits are subject to preservation under New York Dock and it will not be cited by any party in any other negotiations or proceedings.

                        Yours truly,

                        W.S. Hinckley

                        General Director Labor Relations

AGREED:

_______________________                              _________________________

General Chairman            UPED                           General Chairman DRGW

_______________________                              _________________________

General Chairman            UPWR                          General Chairman SP West 

                        February 1,1997

                        Side Letter No. 3

Gentlemen:

During our negotiations we discussed ARTICLE 7 - VACATION of the September 1995 Agreement between Southern Pacific Lines and your Organization.

This will reflect our understanding that those former Southern Pacific engineers who are  covered by this Implementing Agreement and who are presently covered by the above agreement provision shall be entitled to obtain the benefits of said ARTICLE, through December 31, 1997.  Thereafter, vacation benefits shall be as set forth in the controlling agreement on the merged territory.

                        Yours truly,

                        W.S. Hinckley

                        General Director Labor Relations

AGREED:

_______________________                              _________________________

General Chairman            UPED                           General Chairman DRGW

_______________________                              _________________________

General Chairman UPWR              x                      General Chairman SP West

                        February 1, 1997

                        Side Letter No. 4

Gentlemen:

During the negotiations the BLE  had many Local Chairmen or their representatives in attendance.  They  listened to the negotiations, readings of the different Sections of the agreement and listened to the debate and explanations given for them.  The Carrier believes that as both Local Chairmen and as participants to the negotiations that they can play an important role in assisting other engineers in the decision making that will follow the merger implementation.  As such the Carrier proposed that when the first surplus of employees was created that the BLE Local Chairman for each committee or his designate (in writing) shall be the first persons placed on the protection boards. 

While on these boards they will be placed on a hold status and will be required to be available to answer employee questions, discuss merger integration issues with local officers and help coordinate with CMS issues relating to the transfer of employees from one zone to another or outside the Hub and the assignment of employees to positions.  In addition they will be performing their normal and usual duties associated with the Union Office they hold.  While on this hold status they will not be rotating on the board.  If they are required to relocate as a result of the merger or just learn new trackage, time will be granted for the accomplishment of these events.  When there is no longer a surplus in a zone or the interim period ends they will be released back to a position their seniority permits.

                        Yours truly,

                        W.S. Hinckley,

                        General Director Labor Relations

AGREED:

_____________________________                   _____________________________

General Chairman UPED                                                General Chairman DRGW

_____________________________                   _______________________ Chairman UPWR                                                  General Chairman SP West

                                    February 1, 1997

                                    Side Letter No. 5

Gentlemen:

This refers to Article II Section (I) of the Salt Lake Hub implementing agreement.  Section (I) states that the parties will address the flow of seniority in and/or out of the Hub during the interim period in a side letter.  In reviewing the various options available to the parties, the concern of those General Chairmen who had seniority districts both inside and outside the Hub and those General Chairmen who did not, the following was agreed to:

1.            If a prior right roster has a surplus,  engineers on that roster wishing to exercise seniority outside the Hub during the interim period will be governed as follows:

a. When the Carrier notifies the General Chairmen that there is a surplus on the prior right roster it will notify employees of the number of engineers that it will permit to exercise seniority outside the Hub on their old seniority area.

b. Engineers, in seniority order, will have ten days to exercise their seniority and will relinquish all seniority in the Hub.  If an insufficient number do not voluntarily exercise their seniority, no engineer will be forced under these side letter provisions, but the provisions of the implementing agreement will govern.

2.            Since these seniority moves are voluntary and not required by the merger they are not covered by the relocation provisions of the agreement and/or New York Dock.  They cannot create relocation allowances for those who may be displaced.  Engineers who have New York Dock wage protection will retain that protection, however, they will be treated as holding the highest rated assignment they could hold in the Hub if higher than one they can hold in their new area.  Engineers displaced will not receive wage protection as a result of these voluntary moves.

3.            Engineers will not be allowed to exercise seniority into the Hub.

4.            Upon termination of the interim period, seniority within the Salt Lake Hub shall be finalized, with engineers holding seniority in only one seniority district.

Should this properly reflect what was agreed to in negotiations please sign below.

                                    Yours truly,

                                

Agreed:

_____________________________                               _____________________________

General Chairman WR                                                    General Chairman UPWR

_____________________________                               ______________________________

General Chairman DRGW                                      General Chairman SP West

 

Copyright © 2001 Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers and Trainman - WRGCA                               
Last modified: July 28, 2009           Contact: Site Administrator